Joseph L. Wiess

No, just no. Britain broke away from the EU in order to gain their freedom back.

The EU has a long history of forcing member states to open their borders to third worlders who don't follow their laws, who rape their women, and traffic their children.

Of course Germany would want to export their misery to other countries.

Why would I want to throw off the shackles of our imperfect, but free, government and bind myself to a foreign power where I would have no say?

I'd rather throw off the shackles and have my state go it's own way.

There is an old saying, "If you don't own it, it's not yours."

What would stop the host country from allowing all the new infrastructure to be built on rented land, and then dispossessing people from something they don't own?

So no beef, no lamb, no chicken. What are we supposed to eat? I'm not a vegetarian.
We have canine an incisor teeth for a reason. We eat meat for protien and energy.
Grass doesn't provide energy, wheat doesn't provide energy, plants don't provide enough energy.
You'd think that with the governments falling for this nonsense and trying to kill us, people would be smarter.
And before you talk about synthetic meat. It's not the same. You can't get the same amount of protien and energy from fake meat.
Rewilding the world is just not feasible. There are already people starving and you want to add to that number.
Or would you be satisfied if we just decimated (Killed 1/10th) the population of the world?

The world was not given to us by the creator to sit unused and look pretty. It was given to us to be lived in, cultivated, and shaped responsibly.
Believe me, the run of the mill farmer doesn't want to use pesticides or plant GMO crops. He wants to use heirloom seeds and feed the world.
There was a time when farms in Kansas, Texas, and the center of the country fed the rest of the world, but successive stupidity from government has turned that farmland into cornland.
There was a time when we imported things such as cane sugar and rice, letting each country sell its excess. Now governments interfere with that, which leads to all the problems you cited.
You can't fix it by killing off the food supply. We have herds of cattle because hunting is banned in certain places and people are too lazy to hunt that pig or that deer or that buffallo and kill it.
Why don't you start out by calling for the dissolution of mega-cities and mandate that people return to the rural areas and fend for themselves?
When we were mostly rural, you didn't need the mass farms that plant GMO seeds. Every person took care of their own needs and still managed to care for the land.

It would be far easier to pass a law that says, "If you send soldiers out to an undeclared war, you will be pulled from congress and will join them on the front line." That would stop the eternal wars.

I think that any new city that will be built, should be harmonious with nature. The buildings shouldn't be glass and steel, nor should they be heat sinks. They should have plenty of green spaces, and be designed for walking, cycling, or skating, as a means of getting around.
They should be designed to capture and reclaim water, and should be designed to accomodate gray water when watering grass and plants. Also no new city should house more than 300 thousand. The cities should be able to be fed using local farmers and ranchers.
But that's just me talking.

Taxes, if needed, should be a flat 10% across the board. As long as everyone pays the same rate, who cares what the dollar amount is.
Technocrats, at least the ones here in the states, are idiots. They never seem to see beyond their decisions and if anyone disagrees, they attempt to jail them.
I, as a member of the "Jury" would have input on law, justice, and detainment. I understand how medicine works and how "vaccines" are supposed to work. I hate the convulted tax code and would opt for a flat rate. Instead of jailing people who are addicted to drugs, i would suggest rehab and community service. For crimes like rape and murder, banishment to an island where the criminal has to survive on his own.